DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
' BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
TUR
Docket No: 1742-14
° 13 March 2015
Dear UR
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
.application on 11 March 2015. After careful ¢énsideration of
your application, the Board concluded that your application was
not timely filed, and that it would not be in. the interest of
justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a
timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that you
‘were promised ‘that your character of service would be upgrade
two years after’ being discharged’ as the basis for waiving the
statute of-limitations. The Board determined this was an
insufficient reason.to waive the statute since there is no
evidence provided that indicates you were unable to file your
application within the three years from when you learned of your
characterization of service.
You may request reconsideration of this decision within one’ year
from the date ofthe Board’s decision. However, your request
must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not
reasonably available to you when -you submitted your application.
‘Further, the’evidence must pertain.to the timeliness of your
application or te its merits. Absent. such additional evidence,
further review of your application is not possible: >
o oo : -" '* ROBERT. J. -O' NEILL
el. oo SO “. - 0 ., «Executive Director
~ Oe at a)
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4143 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March 2015. Additionally, you were counseled and warned after your first NJP, that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0852 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your _ application on 28 January 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. As a result, the Board was unable to discern from your record or application why your application was filed 40...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14_Redacted
Although your application was not filed in a time Board found it in the interest of justice to wai limitations and consider your application on its three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. After consulting with legal counsel, you lected to present your case to an administrative discharge board — (0 94...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9787 14
Further, the Board particularly noted that you ing senior have provided nothing showing that either the reporti or the reviewing officer has acknowledged that the two-tiered evaluation system, to which you and the statement dated 1 May — a he all ee 2014 from Captain i -, USMC refer, was applied in preparing your fitness report. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board - prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3914 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “you were told your discharge automatically becomes Honorable when your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3838 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 3838-14 3 April 2015 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, sectiom 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2015. After careful consideration of -...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11612 14_Redacted
Documentary material considered by of your application, together with all : in support thereof, your naval record, and regulations, and policies record r personality n immaturi heroin, cocaine, amphetamine uana, a diethylamide (LSD). Further, the Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Navy when your request for discharge was granted and you should not be permitted to charige it now. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8780 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket 26 Mar 1 N NR8780-14 tio cea: This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. NR&780-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2122 14
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2015. Specifically, you provided a statement that you ‘were told to wait for about seven years after being discharged before applying for an upgrade of your character of service, and that your- character reference letters and post service conduct should be ‘taken into.consideration’ as the basis for waiving the statute of limitations. The Board determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3452 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2015. The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, on 17 October 1986, you were so discharged The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your discharge and...